Monday, December 14, 2009

So hot right now

I mostly write fantasy / romance / adventure mixtures. I would describe some as mainly romance, but it's definitely not erotica. I have just read a review of what's hot in the market, and it seems to be nothing BUT erotica. I have read a few samples and frankly, I felt they often debased love, women, etc. I don't consider physical injury of the beloved by the "lover" to be a part of romance, for example. Should I just accept that I am an old-fashioned nerd and crawl back under my rock, or is there light at the end of the tunnel?

'I don't consider physical injury of the beloved by the "lover" to be a part of romance, for example' - then please don't read any of the Twilight books because you've just described the central tenet of all four of them.

Okay! Off my hobby horse now. Let's talk about you instead. You're not an old-fashioned nerd - I don't really believe that all the romance/erotica stories out there involve injuries. I am fairly sure Stephanie Laurens, for example, doesn't write romance stories that are violent or debase the female characters. I guess it depends exactly what 'market' you're talking about - it sounds like you are writing for a defined slice of the romance readership and within that slice you're concerned that the tide has turned towards sadomasochistic sex rather than romance - or, even, erotic sex. Perhaps it has. I'm not a specialist on the romance market. But trends are trends and they change. Write the romance and sex the way you want to write it - I can guarantee you will not be the only person in the world who wants romance and sex to read that way. Women are the majority of romance (and book) readers and they're a diverse bunch.

I could launch into a general discussion of why the culture may be skewing towards sexualised violence towards women and why women may actually want to read about it or watch it, but I'm fairly sure I'm meant to be blogging about books, not sex, regardless of how much fun the latter topic may be ...

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I wonder if this person is reading paranormals, which are a big chunk of the successful fantasy/adventure/romance market at the moment. Many of them have an erotic element, often tied into the nature of the paranormal entity (e.g. dominance with werewolves).

Write the romance and sex the way you want to write it - I can guarantee you will not be the only person in the world who wants romance and sex to read that way. Women are the majority of romance (and book) readers and they're a diverse bunch.

Absolutely. There's a reason Harlequin has so many imprints, all with different levels of sweetness/explicitness: the market is big and diverse enough to support them (even if erotica seems particularly prevalent at the moment). This also applies to books that are published primarily as fantasy with a romance element, and so on.

Finally, there is nothing worse than reading a sex scene that has the slightest suggestion of author-cringe. Please don't write that kind of scene unless it's important to the story AND you're able to pull it off. Er, no pun intended.

Anonymous Editor

Anonymous said...

If you are in Australia, I would recommend joining the Romance Writers of Australia, a fabulous organisation. At the very least, visit their website.

Yes, erotica is big, but the romance market is much bigger. We have some wonderful romance authors here in Australia, and they write every flavour of romance you can imagine.

Anonymous Romance Author (published in romance, not erotica)

Cass said...

Given the rise of "Fifty Shades of Grey", this question was prescient! I've read some really interesting articles about why these types of books are so popular; the gist is that they appeal to the same basic desires as Jane Eyre did: the innocent heroine, the dark and threatening lover who will sweep her (and the reader) off her feet. Except of course these days we're all a bit jaded so keeping your crazy wife locked in the tower isn't dangerous enough anymore - so now it's bondage freak CEOs and sparkly vampires.